findersraka.blogg.se

Stent using a guideliner
Stent using a guideliner









The complications were mild and resolved by conservative management in both groups. Stent patency and survival time did not significantly differ between the two groups (p=0.355 and p=0.570). Stent occlusion occurred in 14 patients (35%) who received MSCPM-II and in seven patients (21.9%) who received CMSs. Results: The two groups did not differ significantly in basic characteristics and mean followup period (MSCPM-II 194 days vs CMS 277 days, p=0.063). A total of 72 patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstructions were prospectively enrolled. Therefore, the data were analyzed using the intent-to-treat method.

STENT USING A GUIDELINER TRIAL

Methods: This study was initially designed as a prospective randomized trial but was closed early because of a high incidence of early occlusion. The safety and efficacy of a new generation of metallic stents covered with a paclitaxel-incorporated membrane using a Pluronic mixture (MSCPM-II) were compared prospectively with those of covered metal stents (CMSs) in patients with malignant biliary obstructions. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in stent patency or patient survival in MSCPM-II and CMS patients with malignant biliary obstructions.Ībstract = "Background/Aims: A drug-eluting stent for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction was developed to increase stent patency by preventing tumor ingrowth. The safety and efficacy of a new generation of metallic stents covered with a paclitaxel-incorporated membrane using a Pluronic® mixture (MSCPM-II) were compared prospectively with those of covered metal stents (CMSs) in patients with malignant biliary obstructions. Background/Aims: A drug-eluting stent for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction was developed to increase stent patency by preventing tumor ingrowth.









Stent using a guideliner